One of my favorite high school teachers was
a former Methodist pastor who was once tasked with teaching a biblical history
class in a Midland, Texas public school.
It was not a class on religion or theology, but a study of the Bible
itself. It didn’t last, and one of the
principal reasons for the failure was constant debate of how it should be
taught. The teacher told of daily phone
calls from parents with corrections and additions to the syllabus from varying
viewpoints, not from the text itself.
I studied Deism as it occurred in Thomas
Jefferson’s lifetime. I became
fascinated with Jefferson’s take on the religion of the time and discovered
that he published what became known as the “Jefferson Bible.” I quickly ordered a copy and inquired about
the history of the book.
It’s important to understand that the
churches in Jefferson’s time were different than today. They were often intermixed with politics and many
became very corrupted. Jefferson served
as Minister to France, which gave him perspective on the Catholic and
protestant churches in Europe. He also
studied the history of the Bible and believed that it had become contaminated
with political agenda, misrepresented facts and even propaganda designed to
turn people away from Christianity. He
clearly believed, as many do today, that surreptitiously motivated people had
distorted the tenets taught by Christ.
I took a great interest in Christian
apologetics, especially in the Catholic and Lutheran churches. Even the most devout biblical scholars
struggle with the history of how many of the writings in the Bible came to
be. There are numerous conflicts and
inconsistencies within the Judeo-Christian Bible which have led many away from
faith and practice of religions. They come
into great conflict with biblical literalists who accept without question.
My own spiritual path has led me to
fascinating conversation with ministers, biblical scholars, laymen, church
parishioners, Deists and atheists. What
fascinates is that many of the most devout Christians do not have a completely
literal view of the Bible, but a very strong spiritual faith in the tenets of
Christianity and respect for their traditions.
For them, their belief does not require a suspension of reason and bonds
a person with what I believe is a strong understanding and practice of what
Christ intended for us.
Jefferson
was suspicious of supernatural claims in the Bible, including miracles, virgin
birth, resurrection and ascension.
Again, it is important to understand that Jefferson faced a very
different religious and scholastic climate in his time. He believed that many of the supernatural
elements were introduced to turn people from the scripture or to perhaps engage
others. This is important today, as many
people can’t grasp why we are not witness to similar events in modern
times. Religious leaders vary greatly on
their explanation of this, and it greatly divides Christianity as a whole. The same occurs within conflicting scripture
and other ambiguous elements of the ancient text.
What
resulted was a compilation of Gospel scripture known as The Philosophy of Jesus of Nazareth, where Jefferson included only
the teachings by Christ himself. It
became known as “The Jefferson Bible,” a title not placed by Jefferson
himself. Jefferson did not write the
book, rather he physically cut New Testament passages from Greek, French, Latin
and English variants of the Bible and arranged them chronologically to form a
clear depiction of the life and teachings of Christ. While not all supernatural events were
redacted, the majority of these events were.
What remained was a very clear reading of the moral tenets taught by
Christ and a clear historical picture of his life.
In
1904, 9000 copies of this book were printed and distributed to members of
Congress and their staff. In a copy that
I own, a foreword indicates that these were distributed well into the 1950’s. It is clear that Jefferson and others
believed that Christian morals and philosophy should be a part of our nation’s
foundation. Jefferson’s compilation
spread the word in a manner easily acceptable by Christians, Deists and even
atheists. I consider this a great
victory rather than an aberration of the text.
What
fascinates me about this topic is that in our time, Jefferson has become a
central figure in the separation of church and state, and he has become the
center of debate in much the same way as the teachings he sought to preserve. Atheists use his anti-church quotes to push
their own agenda, and Christians exemplify him as supporting the USA as a
Christian nation. YouTube has plenty of
videos where Jefferson’s thoughts are bent to conform to one viewpoint or
another although he was very clear in his own writings on exactly where he
stood.
I’ve
had conversations with people who refuse Jefferson’s book because it is not the
accepted text of their religion. Some
consider it blasphemy while others see tremendous value in it. It was never intended as a replacement, but
it is an effective means of passing the teachings of Christ. It is very clear and concise, and most
certainly easier to grasp than the King James Gospel itself. I often compare it to the numerous movies
about the life of Christ where there are additions and retractions from the
Gospel due to denominational belief, conciseness or brevity. It’s not uncommon for well-meaning writers
to edit in this fashion, as evidenced by the many variants of the Bible. Since every Christian denomination is
commanded to be evangelists to some degree, I see where works of this nature
are critical to the livelihood of today’s churches.
The Philosophy of
Jesus of Nazareth should be in everyone’s
library. Even if you are a complete
biblical literalist, it is highly useful in bringing others to an understanding
of your beliefs. For those who are not
Christian, it is a valuable means of understanding the true fundamentals of Christianity
without bias or church dogma. It’s an
invaluable tool for those who are searching, frustrated and confused in a
spiritual world obstructed by countless interpretations, illogical dogma and
misunderstandings and agendas. It’s
available in print and the original 1904 copies are quite valuable. The Kindle version is $0.99 through Amazon,
and there are free online versions and “modern English” versions available as
well.
"In
extracting the pure principles which he taught, we should have to strip off the
artificial vestments in which they have been muffled by priests, who have
travestied them into various forms, as instruments of riches and power to
themselves. We must dismiss the Platonists and Plotinists, the Stagyrites and
Gamalielites, the Eclectics, the Gnostics and Scholastics, their essences and
emanations, their logos and demiurges, aeons and daemons, male and female, with
a long train of … or, shall I say at once, of nonsense. We must reduce our
volume to the simple evangelists, select, even from them, the very words only
of Jesus, paring off the amphibologisms into which they have been led, by
forgetting often, or not understanding, what had fallen from him, by giving
their own misconceptions as his dicta, and expressing unintelligibly for others
what they had not understood themselves. There will be found remaining the most
sublime and benevolent code of morals which has ever been offered to man. I
have performed this operation for my own use, by cutting verse by verse out of
the printed book, and arranging the matter which is evidently his, and which is
as easily distinguishable as diamonds in a dunghill. The result is an octavo of
forty-six pages, of pure and unsophisticated doctrines." - Thomas Jefferson, 1813
Great article... well done! Are you by chance a fan of Glenn Beck ?
ReplyDeleteJeff KA0EGE
Thanks, Jeff. Honestly, I haven't heard much of Glenn Beck since his radio show was dropped locally. I can't say I'm a fan for that reason but I've liked much of what I've heard from him.
ReplyDelete